English Notes Latest Questions

In:
  1. Lucifer
    Lucifer better to reign in hell than to serve in heaven

    The poem “An Essay on Criticism” by Alexander Pope is a critique of criticism. It is written from the point of view that the true purpose of criticism is to judge a work of art on its own merits. Detailed article on Alexander Pope

    The poem “An Essay on Criticism” by Alexander Pope is a critique of criticism. It is written from the point of view that the true purpose of criticism is to judge a work of art on its own merits.

    Detailed article on Alexander Pope

    See less
    • 0
In:
  1. Lucifer
    Lucifer better to reign in hell than to serve in heaven

    Salient features of Neo-classical criticism are: It advocates the study of literary works as wholes; It focuses on the aesthetic effect of the whole work on the reader; It highlights the moral dimension of literary works; It focuses on the positive aspects of the work. It stresses the sensuousness oRead more

    Salient features of Neo-classical criticism are:

    1. It advocates the study of literary works as wholes;
    2. It focuses on the aesthetic effect of the whole work on the reader;
    3. It highlights the moral dimension of literary works;
    4. It focuses on the positive aspects of the work.
    5. It stresses the sensuousness of the literary work
    6. It stresses the unity and interaction of the literary work
    7. It stresses the aesthetic quality of the literary work
    8. It is relatively less concerned with the social, historical, etc., background of the literary work.

    Read detailed article on Neo Classical Criticism

    See less
    • 0
In:
  1. Lucifer
    Lucifer better to reign in hell than to serve in heaven

    Coleridge's ideal critic is one who can dissociate his own personality from an analysis of the work. He defines good criticism as a 'disinterested endeavour to explain the Author's meaning to the Reader.' He talks of the critic's being 'reflective and judicious', and of his being 'guided by a pure dRead more

    Coleridge’s ideal critic is one who can dissociate his own personality from an analysis of the work. He defines good criticism as a ‘disinterested endeavour to explain the Author’s meaning to the Reader.’ He talks of the critic’s being ‘reflective and judicious’, and of his being ‘guided by a pure desire to ascertain and impart the truth.’

    He is also significant in his views on the relation of the artist to his work, and the idea of the organic nature of the latter. He says that the imagination is ‘active and productive’ and that ‘the work of art is not an instrument of passive enjoyment but a stimulus to thought and action.’

    See less
    • 0
In:
  1. Lucifer
    Lucifer better to reign in hell than to serve in heaven

    Matthew Arnold was a Victorian critic. He was a poet and a critic who wrote about the social problems of his time. His prominent poem was "Dover Beach" which reflected his views of the problems in Victorian society. Matthew Arnold was a Victorian critic best known for his literary criticism. EndymioRead more

    Matthew Arnold was a Victorian critic. He was a poet and a critic who wrote about the social problems of his time. His prominent poem was “Dover Beach” which reflected his views of the problems in Victorian society.

    Matthew Arnold was a Victorian critic best known for his literary criticism. Endymion, The Study of Poetry and On Translating Homer are his major works.

    He was a classicist and a romantic in the sense that he believed that English poetry should be like that of the Greeks, and that the English Classicism was the most perfect form of poetry. He believed that poetry should be a source of culture and should elevate the public taste. He believed that poetry should also maintain its connection to the general public. He believed poetry should be a source of culture and should elevate the public taste.

    See less
    • 1
In:
  1. Lucifer
    Lucifer better to reign in hell than to serve in heaven

    According to Eliot's "The Function of Criticism" notes, criticism is a "discipline of the interpretive method, a way of learning to read, a way of enjoying poetry and of learning to enjoy it more". In other words ’The Function of Criticism’ is the “disapproval of the way things are”.

    According to Eliot’s “The Function of Criticism” notes, criticism is a “discipline of the interpretive method, a way of learning to read, a way of enjoying poetry and of learning to enjoy it more”. In other words ’The Function of Criticism’ is the “disapproval of the way things are”.

    See less
    • 0